Third result: the need for other sciences
If we acknowledge that empirical science alone cannot answer some questions because of the limits of the senses and time, we must ask: are there other reliable sources of knowledge?
We are not rejecting empirical science; we are placing it in its proper field: useful and powerful within its domain, but not sufficient for every domain.
Therefore, we must investigate other sciences that support it, such as rational sciences, and perhaps transmitted sciences if their reliability is established through a suitable scientific method.
The point is not to believe every transmitted claim without testing, but to seek a method that verifies transmission just as experiment is verified in its own field.
